The questionnaire contains 24 short closed-ended and quick unrestricted questions, such as background factors. The previous issues accumulated details on experiences of financial swaps, frequency and range dates, demographic credentials, like, eg, sex, get older, and sexual orientation ( desk 1), motivations for glucose internet dating ( dining table 2), and experience of supplying or making use of companion service. Most were looking for heterosexual arrangements, but the heterosexual inclination got healthier on the list of male participants (97 percent) than one of the female respondents (61 percentage). Even though age restrict to register on the webpage are 18, 10 percent associated with ladies reported becoming young than 18 (14a€“17) (see desk 1, Figure 1 and Figure 2). 6 The unrestricted questions answered the meanings and reasons around glucose internet dating. The interview in addition to review happened to be conducted in Swedish. Gunnarsson translated facts getting quoted into English.
The interview as well as the study data are examined qualitatively. Whilst interview facts offered additional depth, the review facts supplied depth. Some proportions of the review facts were reviewed quantitatively, including, get older, sex, and intimate direction. Interview transcriptions and qualitative survey responses happened to be processed in NVivo through a mix of data-driven and concept-driven programming. The challenge of how-to identify sugar matchmaking (especially with regards to prostitution) plus the problem of crucial vs. intrinsic reasons comprise conceptually type in the programming processes. Analytical memo publishing was utilized to document activities and interesting themes during coding including a alternative learning with the material. Using the observation that the content displayed a wide variety of practices and knowledge, we sought after a method of categorizing these differences. It turned clear that the experiences decided not to differ along a unitary axis, thus, instead of dividing them into one pair of kinds (cf. Scull 2020), we chose to focus the comparison around three important measurements that emerged as the most decisive organizers regarding the differentiations: (1) The useful content material of sugar internet dating agreements: precisely what do glucose daters carry out collectively? (2) The forms of settlement involved: exactly how are a€?babiesa€? paid? and (3) a€?Babies’a€? motivational reasons for glucose matchmaking: as to what extent carry out they partake in the plan due to the product value or simply because they enjoyed those activities in and of themselves? From inside the next, the meeting and study facts were analyzed jointly when it comes to various kinds of sugar matchmaking associated with each differentiating dimension. Whenever possible, numbers are provided in connection with regularity of every class among individuals. Notice, though, your rates commonly always representative with the wider inhabitants of glucose daters, which individuals often is not nicely split into classes, since many need a selection of various knowledge therefore the issues operating the data generation weren’t built to accommodate this particular article’s logical measurements.
1st dimension main for distinguishing between varieties of glucose online dating issues the practical information for the sugar internet dating plan. http://datingmentor.org/escort/arlington/ The undertaking of glucose dating are split into three categories. In the 1st classification, we find a mere intimate deal; for the next, a€?babiesa€? and a€?daddiesa€? are involved with a comprehensive matchmaking plan such as sex but alternative activities; during the 3rd, the parties mingle in a dating-like trends, but sex just isn’t the main plan.
Half of the a€?babya€? interviewees (7 of 15) and another a€?daddya€? interviewee (1 of 9) equated sugar online dating possibly with all the clear-cut buying and selling of intercourse, or reported using glucose dating sites for this specific purpose, while the only way of employing the site or as you way among others. Inside the survey feedback, 13 percentage of a€?babya€? participants and 3 percent of a€?daddya€? respondents unambiguously equated glucose matchmaking with prostitution or selling/buying gender. When asked about benefits of sugar matchmaking compared to other designs of matchmaking, one review respondent reported, a€?It’s maybe not a kind of internet dating [smiley]; you offer and get sexa€? (a€?baby,a€? 28). A recurrent motif inside the product is sugar matchmaking was a glossy address for prostitution, as articulated by another study respondent: a€?This is prostitution. We are into self-deception. No body people wants to contact our selves hooker or john. Therefore we changed the language and launched they in a nicer packagea€? (a€?baby,a€? 25). This crude consciousness about a€?the real naturea€? of sugar dating contrasts aided by the importance of past study about how sugar daters have a tendency to delimit the things they’re doing from prostitution and sex efforts ( Chu and Laidler 2016; Nayar 2017) and may be linked to Swedish media, in which glucose relationship as a cover for prostitution was a recurring motif ( Olsson 2019; Svenska Dagbladet 2017).